There is a strange and revealing truth at the heart of Europe’s migration politics, and it is this:
Spain receives more irregular boat arrivals than the United Kingdom — yet it treats migrants with more dignity, less hysteria, and far greater political maturity.
In 2024, Spain registered around 61,000 irregular sea arrivals.
The UK recorded roughly 37,000.
And yet, if you walked into a British newsroom or scrolled through British political Twitter, you would think that civilisation was on the brink of collapse.
Why is that?
Why does a country with fewer arrivals behave as though it’s under siege, while a Mediterranean frontline state quietly manages the reality without setting its national hair on fire?
The answer tells us something uncomfortable — not about migration, but about the moral core of modern British politics.
Spain: A Social Democracy That Still Remembers Its Soul
Spain has no illusions about its geographic position. If you sit at the hinge between Africa and Europe, people will come. Some are fleeing violence. Some are escaping poverty. Some are simply seeking a future.
Spain’s response is almost boring in its sanity:
-
Rescues at sea are organised, not weaponised.
-
Asylum processes function without turning every application into a national morality play.
-
NGOs and municipalities handle frontline integration without being smeared as traitors or “pull factors”.
-
And critically, Spain offers a legal pathway — arraigo social — that allows migrants to be regularised after two years, recognising the simple fact that if people are already living in your society, the most rational thing you can do is integrate them.
This is not naïveté.
It is pragmatic humanism.
A country that is actually under pressure has learned that panic makes everything worse — and that moral clarity and administrative realism are, in the long run, the only sustainable approach.
Britain: A Superpower of Performative Fear
Then there is Britain — a country with fewer boat arrivals, fewer border pressures, and incomparably more political theatre.
The new Labour government, elected on a promise of competence, has appointed a Home Secretary — an Oxford-educated politician who should know better — who has plunged headlong into the same punitive reflex that defined her predecessors:
-
Proposing visa bans on entire nationalities.
-
Reducing asylum processing time limits to the point of absurdity.
-
Recycling the rhetoric of American culture wars and Trumpian nationalism.
-
Treating refugees as a statistical nuisance to be minimised rather than as human beings with stories, trauma, and dignity.
This is not the behaviour of a confident nation.
It is the behaviour of a country addicted to manufactured panic, because panic is the last remaining tool in its political toolkit.
Britain no longer has a coherent economic model.
It no longer has a unified social vision.
And its political class no longer has a narrative of who the country is, or what it stands for.
So it turns to the only story it has left: fear of the outsider.
The Moral Collapse of British Labour
The tragedy here is not simply that Labour has adopted conservative immigration framing.
The tragedy is that Labour has forgotten its own genealogy.
Social democracy — the European kind, the post-war kind, the moral kind — was built on a simple conviction:
The health of a society is measured by how it treats the stranger.
This was not an abstract ideal.
It was a lesson drawn from genocide, fascism, war, and displacement — a recognition that if Europe was to rebuild itself, it needed a political ethic grounded in solidarity, not exclusion.
Spain, with all its imperfections, still remembers this.
Britain does not.
The Labour Party of today triangulates itself into oblivion, chasing right-wing voters who will never love it, and sacrificing the values that once made it a moral force in world politics.
A Labour Party that governs by fear is not Labour.
It is simply a softer mask on the same punitive instincts that have now defined British immigration policy for twenty years.
Migration as a Mirror
Migration does not destabilise nations.
It exposes them.
Spain’s handling of higher arrival numbers reveals a society that, despite its flaws, still has a functioning moral compass and a political class capable of distinguishing reality from theatre.
Britain’s handling of fewer arrivals reveals something far more troubling:
A nation with no confidence in itself, no stable identity, and no political imagination.
A country performing toughness because it no longer knows how to perform leadership.
A Labour Party performing cruelty because it has forgotten how to perform justice.
A Simple Truth Worth Saying Out Loud
A country does not drown because desperate people cross its waters.
It drowns when it forgets who it is.
Spain, for all its pressures, has not forgotten.
Britain, tragically, has.
And until the Labour Party recovers its moral centre — the centre that once made Britain a pioneer of compassion, dignity, and internationalism — its immigration policy will remain nothing more than an anxious shadow of its own lost ideals.
“The moral test of government is how it treats those who are in the dawn of life, the twilight of life, and the shadows of life.”
— Hubert Humphrey
